Edited to Add (2/12/2012): This was posted to the local birding list today, about the situation at Boundary Bay where the video below was shot:
About 4:30pm a woman from [a rehabilitation society] up the road was seen walking out to the various groups and very kindly asking them to retreat back to the dike. She was very successful in doing so … she said that two owls had been brought in recently suffering from an ailment that they attribute to stress … They were both underweight and both owls died. Therefore, they are now going out on a regular basis to request that people stay on the dike and allow the owls to hunt normally.
I’m very glad they’re out there, but it should never have come to this. I realize it’s impossible to consistently patrol other photographers’ behavior, but I think those of us who work hard to abide by strict wildlife photography ethics, need to make sure that when we’re around, we at least try to educate on why wildlife photography ethics are important. I’m still surprised by the photographers standing by in this video without interfering. Can’t for the life of me understand that complacency, although upon further viewing, it looks as though they’re waiting for the owl’s reaction.
——————————–
I’ve seen my share of questionable behavior out in the field, but this video got me worked up tonight. It was posted by a local birder who videotaped the madness that’s hit the Northwest as a result of the Snowy Owl irruption:
First, I wish the videographer had zoomed in a bit closer. Anyone recognize this guy? Please give him a flogging — from me, with a smile.
Second, I can’t tell if the other two photographers are saying anything to Mr. Egregious, but if not, what th–? If I’d been there, that guy would have never cleared the tree without some intervention. Oh wait — I wouldn’t have been there, because the sign on the path clearly says that no one should venture into the habitat to disturb the owls.
Apparently, this type of behavior has been going on all season as a result of Snowy Owl fever. I’ve read accounts of respectful days between owls, birders and photographers. And then I’ve heard stories like the one shown above. I usually stay away from birding frenzies for this reason. I’d like to see the Snowies while they’re here, but have been torn about joining the melee.
The owls are sticking around, despite annoying humans. I hope they’re fattening up for their migration. If I do decide to head up to British Columbia next week — and if I see some of this owl-stalking in the scrub, I’ll have no hesitation to photograph and report anyone who goes Rambo on the Snowies.
Think I’m a hard ass? Or think I’m justified?
The way I see it … it’s a shrinking world in terms of habitat. It’s a growing world in terms of human population. It’s a bigger field in terms of who owns gear. And there seems to be an increasing sense of entitlement by humans (not just photographers), toward wild animals. I personally don’t think it’s that difficult to hold back and give the animal space. It does require some resistance to temptation, and you do lose some shots. Sometimes, though, the shots appear precisely because you sat and waited and didn’t encroach.
I always say that no photograph is worth the compromised well-being of the subject. I think it’s especially unfortunate when photographers go to these lengths for an image, when we, as a group, can be such good emissaries for the wild animals who literally depend on the good sense of humans for their survival.
Respectful photographers and birders, observing owls from the path at Boundary Bay (Photo © John Biehler/Flickr):
Photo © John Biehler - Flickr Creative Commons
Previous post on wildlife ethics
{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
Ingrid, I watched the video and I could feel my blood pressure rising. I guess I am a hard ass too because I would have photographed that guy and reported him. That man’s behavior gives all bird photographers a black eye. There is NEVER a case where a photograph is worth more than the well being of the subject. Period.
Mia, I know. I wish I’d had a blood pressure cuff on my arm the first time I watched it. When I lived in the Bay Area, I witnessed a lot of disruptive behavior in regional parks — by people who simply did not understand what our relationship to wildlife should be. The most common was parents allowing their kids to harass, chase, throw rocks at and otherwise disturb wild birds. I contacted the regional park systems and asked if the would consider more education on this front — even signs at popular wildlife locations, explaining the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and so forth. They were receptive to my concerns but, as with everything else, budget constraints prevented all but bare bones efforts in this area. I have an ambition concerning wildlife education which I still hope to achieve … when I’m able to change course in my work and branch off into my own wildlife endeavors. A lot of people these days seem to feel they “own” wild animals, and can do as they see fit when they encounter them. I’m not sure how that ethic arose. It’s certainly not the one I grew up with. I’d like to be an instrument in changing that somehow.
No, you’re not a hard ass – that guy is an ignorant and selfish ass****. I noticed this clip posted on FB this morning and deliberattely didn’t watch it because I knew how PO’d I’d get but when I saw that you had posted it I watched it. Twice. And yes, I’m PO’d, big time. Your words on this post could have been my own, down to the last punctuation mark we so thoroughly agree on the subject. Thanks for posting the clip and I hope it gets hundreds of views! And that the anal sphincter who is the star of the show “enjoys” his notoriety.
Love the candor, Ron … and I agree. I had to sit and recompose a few times last night after watching the video, it had me pretty riled, as well. I can’t for the life of me get inside the head of someone who would do that. You’d think the scrutiny of the amassed birders and photographers would be enough to instill humility and maybe even an ounce of shame. But, that would be expecting way too much from an anal sphincter, me thinks.
Give him a flogging, with a smile? Are you kidding? He should have be shot on sight. There were other people there enjoying the bird, so he’s decided that they were not important. He obviously doesn’t give a flying *&^# about the owl. If I were there, I would have got a face shot and turned it into the athorities. It’s bad enough that the dips&*t is cutting the view of three people, but to harrass an owl?
Well, we’ve all flushed a bird, but this touch hole obvously cares little for wildlife.
I don’t know, Steve … you ever been flogged? Captain Bligh style?
Seriously, though, you’re right about his selfish motives and the illegal owl harassment. I’m stunned that the two other photographers stood by, although we don’t have their audio to know for sure. I have no hesitation calling people out when I see this kind of stuff, even though sometimes it gets a little scary. I’ve had people get violent with me, in one case, over an oiled duck (I was trying to protect it during an oil spill). I almost always carry my monopod for a reason beyond photography.
A Flickr contact of mine shot a photo of a guy, holding a short lens, leaping in front of a Burrowing Owl and harassing it. People documented it but apparently didn’t say anything. I think enforcement needs to start in-field with other photogs and birders.
Wow – I just got an education! I see even those who shoot with a lens can be rude, disruptive and callous. Yes, it is a shrinking world regarding habitat… Sadly that will make these incidents of harassment that much more common. I did not realize that even creatures are paparazzi-threatened. It’s not what I wanted to learn… But thank you still for doing so.
Thanks, Ingrid. I needed to be reminded of this. I linked to this post and your Wildlife Photography Ethics & Philosophy page in my recent sea otter post. Generally, I have a high opinion of myself in how I try to keep my distance with animals and stay on trails, but I’ll admit I don’t ALWAYS follow my own rules.
Katie, thanks for the comment. I posted a note over at your blog in response. As I mentioned there, I don’t think any of us can interact with nature, without having some effect. Wildlife photography ethics are an important basis for actions, but understanding the natural history and behavior of animals goes a long way, too. For me, the more I learn about each species, the better I’m able to asses the reaction and my impact. And none of us is perfect in this regard. Plus … it’s the people who should most be paying attention to this stuff who don’t — and who won’t be reading any ethical guidelines online.
Disclaimer: I’m neither a birder nor a photographer – a friend sent me a link to your blog just for the snowy owl photos. What I saw on this video made me so furious! I could hardly believe what I was seeing.
My friend said that she unwittingly followed other photographers down into the field (not of course getting anywhere near as close as the person in the video), then later saw your post and realized her mistake.
Thank you for taking the trouble to post this. You are helping to educate people like me, who don’t know any better, before we have a chance to do something stupid (although I can’t imagine that guy didn’t know he was doing a VERY BAD THING).
Dale, thanks for stopping by and for this thoughtful reply. The thing is — as people commented on my other Snowy Owl post — we all make mistakes. And we all flush wildlife sometimes, just walking a trail or being a human presence in their world. I certainly have made my share of errors, too. But I think it’s what you do with the information you’re given, once you know and understand. I had a couple of offline discussions with photographers who refused to even concede that they were going against posted signs. It’s difficult to grasp that type of short-sightedness, but it’s out there. Thank you for your kind note and for taking the time to think about the Snowies.